Downloaded Indecent Images by Accident

Telegram: The Dark Web in Your Pocket, a recent article published by BBC News has set out to explore the issues with the Dark Web and how accessible it is via the app Telegram. The article addresses the accessibility of indecent images of children on Telegram and the lack of moderation by Telegram of illegal activity.
Person holding a phone with the Telegram App displayed


At Eventum Legal we often speak to clients who are under investigation or charged with an indecent image offence. It is often that our clients have been on social media platforms such as Telegram or KIK Messenger and have received unsolicited links which when clicked on has led them to indecent images and videos of children, this raises the question then as to whether they are guilty of accessing child abuse material when they never had the intention or desire to download or view the material. 


The issue with the likes of Telegram is that the user, once in a conversation with people who they do not know, has no control over the content that is sent to them. In some instances links that contain a considerable amount of illegal material can be sent, and until it is opened the recipient has no knowledge of what it contained. By the time the user realises, they could potential be storing hundreds of illegal images on their device without any knowledge of their existence.

 



Indecent image offences: 


There are three offences which relate to indecent images, all carry the potential for a custodial sentence upon conviction, but not only this. Those convicted can be made subject to the notification requirements of the Sex Offenders Register, and a Sexual Harm Prevention Order.


1. Possessing indecent images of children 

2. Making indecent images of children 

3. Distribution of indecent images of children


The most commonly charged offence is making indecent images of children which often means to download the image or video from a source. It can also include downloading data which is capable of being turned into an indecent image. 


It is an offence under section 1(1)(a) of the Protection of Children Act 1978 to make an indecent image of a child. Making includes a variety of actions by an individual including:


  • Opening an attachment to an email containing an image.
  • Downloading an image from a website onto a computer screen.
  • Storing an image in a directory on a computer.
  • Accessing a pornographic website in which indecent images appeared by way of automatic “pop-up” mechanism.
  • Receiving an image via social media, even if unsolicited and even if part of a group.
  • Live-streaming images of children.


What can often cause confusion is what age is considered a child. An indecent image of a child depicts a person under the age of 18 years old, despite the age of consent for sexual activity being 16. Therefore, if you receive an image in a group chat on social media, or any platform, that depicts a person who appears to be under the age of 18 engaging in sexual activity, this very well could be an indecent image of a child.

Accessing Indecent Images with no Knowledge


When accessing Telegram and similar social media platforms, the user has no control over what is put into the conversation, if a photo or link is posted which if opened produces an indecent image, and the user does in fact open that image then technically they have made an indecent image of a child.


This can lead to the police attending their property to seize devices and place the person associated with the social media account in question under police investigation. The investigation is most likely to take some time due to the need for forensic examination of the suspects electronic equipment.



laptop in the dark with coding text on screen

What will the police do if I accessed an image by accident?


The initial police involvement arises from a suspicion, and the information to give rise to that suspicion is based on intelligence, not evidence. This is important, because the police will then use forensic examinations to turn their intelligence into the evidence required to prosecute their suspect.


Whilst forensically examining devices for evidence, the suspect is likely to be placed on police bail which in itself can change their life dramatically. Police bail can seek to prohibit the suspect from working within certain professions, living at home, and having access to children - including their own. Common conditions that the police impose are often unlawful, and our lawyers would consider your bail conditions to ensure that the police are imposing them in accordance with the law.


It is likely that the accused will be interviewed by the police, this can take place before examination, after examination or both. During this interview it is very important for the accused to be represented, particularly if they have accidentally accessed indecent material. 


During the examination the police will will try to locate indecent material, web browser history, search term history and content of online conversations which may help to establish that the user has a sexual interest in under age pornographic material. If the images have come into a persons possession accidentally, and downloaded without knowledge then we would not expect the police to find any evidence of an interest, or that the material has been actively obtained and viewed.


Why should I instruct Eventum Legal for an Indecent Image Offence?


Having specialist representation is important. At Eventum Legal our lawyers have spent many years solely representing individuals accused of sexual offences, including indecent images, a common and very serious offence.  


Prior to your interview we would have access to pre-interview disclosure which is a summary of the evidence or intelligence the police are relying on to regard you as a suspect. We will discuss this with you in detail beforehand, and before our attendance at the police station. In addition to the benefit of knowing exactly where you stand prior to your arrival at the police station, you will also know your lawyer, have built a relationship with them and feel confident in their ability to look after you. Using a duty solicitor can only add to the apprehension of the interview, as you will get very little time with them beforehand.


Many cases involving indecent images come down to the forensic evidence and what that says, but if you have a defence then  raising this at the earliest opportunity is crucial, the police forensic team will consider what the suspect raises as a defence. We can assist you in making the best decisions in your case to ensure you are placed in the strongest legal position when faced accused of an indecent image offence.


Contact us today free of charge to confidentially discuss your case. Our lawyers will based their advice on your personal circumstances and the specific facts of the allegations made against you. We can then determine the best way forwards to protect your reputation and future.

We Can Help With

By Jess Wilson June 13, 2025
Have you been charged with indecent image possession? Do you want to know how many cases get dropped? Read our latest article to learn more.
By Jess Wilson June 11, 2025
Understanding the difference between “consent” and “reasonable belief” can be key if you are being investigated or prosecuted for a sexual offence, where these two issues can arise. These are not just technical legal terms; they are real-world concepts that can affect the outcome of serious sexual abuse cases. At Eventum Legal, our aim is to help people grasp these important ideas so that they know where they stand, whether they’re seeking justice, facing an accusation, or just wanting to be informed. Consent and the Law: What Does It Mean? When it comes to sexual activity, the law makes it very clear that “consent” isn’t just about saying yes or no. Consent means agreeing by choice, having the freedom and capacity to make that choice, and being able to change your mind at any time, even if the sexual activity has begun. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that a person consents if they agree by choice and have the freedom and capacity to do so. In practical terms, this means no one should be pressured, forced, or tricked into sex. If someone is too drunk, too scared, or otherwise unable to decide, they cannot legally give consent. This applies also to issues with mental capacity where someone may not have the understanding or ability to give informed consent. When establishing whether consent or reasonable belief applies, the courts examine everything that happened, how the people involved acted, what was said, their relationship, and whether any threats were made. It’s not about just hearing a yes or no, but about whether the agreement was truly given, freely and knowingly, at the time. Reasonable Belief: The Other Side of the Coin While “consent” focuses on the person on the receiving end of sexual activity, “reasonable belief” is about the perspective of the person accused of the crime. UK law says it’s not enough for someone to claim they thought the other person was consenting. The belief that consent existed must be reasonable; it must meet the standard of what a reasonable person would think in those circumstances. This comes down to two questions: did the accused genuinely believe the other person was consenting, and would a reasonable person, knowing what the accused knew and considering everything that happened, have reached the same conclusion? It’s not a defence to say, “I just thought it was okay,” if evidence, actions, or common sense didn’t back that belief up. Courts look at whether the accused checked for consent, paid attention to what was happening, and took steps to make sure everything was agreed upon. How the Law Applies These Concepts The distinction between consent and reasonable belief matters because everyone is responsible for ensuring that consent is present, not just assuming or hoping it is. The prosecution in a sexual offence case has to prove that there was no consent or that the accused did not have a reasonable belief that consent existed. To judge this, courts examine the context: Were both people sober and able to make decisions? Was there clear, positive agreement? Did one person ignore signs of hesitation or discomfort? In cases where someone is very intoxicated or unable to communicate, the law presumes that there is no consent, and it is challenging for anyone to claim a reasonable belief otherwise. However, where alcohol is in question the issue can become complex as we all have difference alcohol tolerances, what may be too drunk to one person, could be different to the other. Therefore, working to establish the intoxication and affect is crucial for lawyers in some cases. In cases where it can be proven that that someone was too drunk to speak or move, and the accused says they thought there was consent just because the person didn’t say “no,” the court is unlikely to accept that as reasonable. The law expects people to check in with their partner, look for positive signs, and stop if there’s any doubt. Clearing Up Common Myths Many misunderstandings exist about how consent and reasonable belief work in real life. One myth is that if someone doesn’t say “no,” they must have agreed. The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” Another myth is that if two people are in a relationship or have had sex before, consent is always assumed. Every sexual act requires consent, every time. Some people also believe that as long as they honestly thought there was consent, that’s enough. But the law sets a higher bar: the belief has to be reasonable, meaning it must be backed up by what happened and what a reasonable person would think. In our digital age, misunderstandings can easily happen through text or online communication. Courts are aware of this and look at all available evidence, including messages and social media, to determine what happened. Other avenues of evidence exploration can include CCTV footage and witnesses. Why These Legal Standards Matter The way UK law approaches consent and reasonable belief has changed over time. In the past, people could argue they had an “honest” belief in consent, even if it wasn’t reasonable. That changed with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which now requires honesty and reasonableness. This protects people from harm and ensures that the law takes the experiences and choices of everyone involved seriously. These rules are designed to keep people safe and ensure everyone’s rights are respected. The law encourages open communication, respect, and responsibility. It expects everyone to look for clear signs of agreement and to stop if there is any doubt or hesitation. What To Do If You’re Involved In A Sexual Offence Case Suppose you’re facing a situation involving consent or reasonable belief and you as the accused want to prove that either of these legal requirements existed, then you must seek legal advice and engage with specialist lawyers who can navigate the complexities of the key legal issues in sexual offence cases. These cases can be stressful and complex, and every detail matters: what was said, what was done, and what steps were taken to ensure everyone agreed. At Eventum Legal, we specialise in helping people understand their rights and responsibilities. We listen, explain your options in straightforward language, and support you throughout the process, always with respect and confidentiality.  Whether you’re seeking justice, defending your reputation, or simply want to know your rights, we’re here to help. Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between consent and reasonable belief? Consent is when a person freely agrees to a sexual act. Reasonable belief is whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed that consent was given, based on all the facts. Can someone be convicted if they misunderstood consent? Yes, if their belief in consent wasn’t reasonable. The court looks at the whole situation, not just what the accused thought. How can I protect myself or prove consent? Open communication and ensuring everyone is comfortable and willing are the safest approaches. If you’re worried about misunderstandings, keep records of conversations. Where can I get help or advice? Contact Eventum Legal for confidential, expert support tailored to your needs.
By Sylvie Smith June 5, 2025
Have you been accused of breaching your SHPO, maybe by accident or knowingly? Speak to our specialist team.
More Posts