Memory Can Be Manipulated: Historic Sexual Offences and False Memory

Research carried out by Portsmouth University suggests that memories can be manipulated, calling for those who engage in psychotherapy sessions to be given a warning before taking part in talking therapies with experts, who they intend to discuss their childhood and relationships with. This is not the first piece of research that has addressed the possibility of the distortion or creation of false memories, and how memory can be manipulated by the way in which discussions during therapy are led. The affect this has on the reliability of expert evidence in court proceedings could be pivotal in many sexual offence cases, particularly historic allegations.

What is a False Memory?

"False memory syndrome" is said to refer to people who seemingly remember events that never actually occurred, False Memory Syndrome is caused by memories of a traumatic episode, most commonly childhood sexual abuse, which are objectively false, but in which the person strongly believes. These pseudo memories usually arise in the context of adult psychotherapy and are often quite vivid and emotionally charged. Although false memory syndrome is rare, and still science understands very little about it, research is ongoing which seems to suggest that although there is nothing to back the possibility of "false memory syndrome", it is at least possible that memories can be manipulated, and the methods used by experts can affect how a person recalls events.

What Does the Recent Study Show? 


The Times newspaper has reported that in a recent study carried out by Portsmouth University,  301 participants were asked to remember either a positive or negative memory of their mother, and a positive or negative memory of a teacher, or nothing at all.


The participants were then asked to rate how positive or negative their feelings were towards their mother and how happy they were in their childhoods.


Those who were asked to write a negative memory of their mothers felt that they were significantly less happy as children, compared with those recalling more positive times.


Lawrence Patihis, a psychological scientist and lead author of the paper, commented that “We found that writing out recent examples of participants’ mothers’ behaviour could lead them to reappraise their mother.


“It also seemed to change the participants’ current emotions towards their mother. And most surprisingly, it seemed to subtly affect the participants’ memories of emotions from childhood.”


He added: “In these experiments, we slightly nudged people’s appraisals of their mothers. But this may happen in a bigger way in the real world.


“Talking to a therapist for years in a way that reconstructs a client’s childhood, and then linking this to their problems, could cause more significant reappraisals of their parents.”


How Could This Affect Criminal Proceedings in Sexual Offence Cases?

As criminal lawyers specialising in sexual offences we are often asked by our clients about the phenomenon of "false memory syndrome", it is important to understand that there is no medical condition of false memory syndrome and scientific evidence on the subject is weak however, what we must consider is the manipulation of memory by others, and the impact this may have on any evidence that the prosecution seek to rely on; whether this be counsellors, psychotherapists, other talking therapy experts, the police, and friends/family who may be witnesses in a criminal case. 


All evidence in criminal proceedings must be admissable, ensuring that it is fair, independent and without influence is crucial to a defendant's right to having a fair trial. If a witness, or expert witness has led a complainant, influenced or manipulated their evidence then the evidence is neither fair or reliable. 


At Eventum Legal we have experienced evidence in cases whereby a therapist discussed their own sexual abuse trauma with the complainant in a case. Some weeks later the complainant visited the therapist again and made new disclosures, which were not apparent during her first sessions.  The fact the complainant had told police that she only remembered this abuse because the therapist had been talking about his own experiences, undermined the records made by the expert and ultimatley the memory of abuse that the complainant had. 


How Can We Help?


Allegations of sexual abuse are extremely sensitive and should be handled appropriately by all parties involved. Our lawyers apply a pragmatic yet robust defence to such allegations, tactfully approaching the evidence ensuring the best outcome for our client. Where third party evidence arises in the form of expert reports, counsellor reports or talking therapy records, we will give careful consideration to the content, making sure any areas of concern are identified which may lead to the evidence being in inadmissible.


New research calling for those who engage in such therapies to be warned about the possibility of memory manipulation is a crucial step forwards in science supporting the possibility of memories not being accurate, and memories being created or developed through engagement with others.


If you have been accused of a sexual offence, then it is possible that third party disclosure evidence will apply. To discuss your case and/or any concerns you have about the impact that others may have had on the evidence of the complainant, then our lawyers provide free initial advice, from your initial contact with us you can expect to be provided with supportive and realistic advice and idea of how we can move your case forwards to achieve the best possible outcome.



Request a Free Initial Consultation

We Can Help With

By Jess Wilson June 13, 2025
Have you been charged with indecent image possession? Do you want to know how many cases get dropped? Read our latest article to learn more.
By Jess Wilson June 11, 2025
Understanding the difference between “consent” and “reasonable belief” can be key if you are being investigated or prosecuted for a sexual offence, where these two issues can arise. These are not just technical legal terms; they are real-world concepts that can affect the outcome of serious sexual abuse cases. At Eventum Legal, our aim is to help people grasp these important ideas so that they know where they stand, whether they’re seeking justice, facing an accusation, or just wanting to be informed. Consent and the Law: What Does It Mean? When it comes to sexual activity, the law makes it very clear that “consent” isn’t just about saying yes or no. Consent means agreeing by choice, having the freedom and capacity to make that choice, and being able to change your mind at any time, even if the sexual activity has begun. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that a person consents if they agree by choice and have the freedom and capacity to do so. In practical terms, this means no one should be pressured, forced, or tricked into sex. If someone is too drunk, too scared, or otherwise unable to decide, they cannot legally give consent. This applies also to issues with mental capacity where someone may not have the understanding or ability to give informed consent. When establishing whether consent or reasonable belief applies, the courts examine everything that happened, how the people involved acted, what was said, their relationship, and whether any threats were made. It’s not about just hearing a yes or no, but about whether the agreement was truly given, freely and knowingly, at the time. Reasonable Belief: The Other Side of the Coin While “consent” focuses on the person on the receiving end of sexual activity, “reasonable belief” is about the perspective of the person accused of the crime. UK law says it’s not enough for someone to claim they thought the other person was consenting. The belief that consent existed must be reasonable; it must meet the standard of what a reasonable person would think in those circumstances. This comes down to two questions: did the accused genuinely believe the other person was consenting, and would a reasonable person, knowing what the accused knew and considering everything that happened, have reached the same conclusion? It’s not a defence to say, “I just thought it was okay,” if evidence, actions, or common sense didn’t back that belief up. Courts look at whether the accused checked for consent, paid attention to what was happening, and took steps to make sure everything was agreed upon. How the Law Applies These Concepts The distinction between consent and reasonable belief matters because everyone is responsible for ensuring that consent is present, not just assuming or hoping it is. The prosecution in a sexual offence case has to prove that there was no consent or that the accused did not have a reasonable belief that consent existed. To judge this, courts examine the context: Were both people sober and able to make decisions? Was there clear, positive agreement? Did one person ignore signs of hesitation or discomfort? In cases where someone is very intoxicated or unable to communicate, the law presumes that there is no consent, and it is challenging for anyone to claim a reasonable belief otherwise. However, where alcohol is in question the issue can become complex as we all have difference alcohol tolerances, what may be too drunk to one person, could be different to the other. Therefore, working to establish the intoxication and affect is crucial for lawyers in some cases. In cases where it can be proven that that someone was too drunk to speak or move, and the accused says they thought there was consent just because the person didn’t say “no,” the court is unlikely to accept that as reasonable. The law expects people to check in with their partner, look for positive signs, and stop if there’s any doubt. Clearing Up Common Myths Many misunderstandings exist about how consent and reasonable belief work in real life. One myth is that if someone doesn’t say “no,” they must have agreed. The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” Another myth is that if two people are in a relationship or have had sex before, consent is always assumed. Every sexual act requires consent, every time. Some people also believe that as long as they honestly thought there was consent, that’s enough. But the law sets a higher bar: the belief has to be reasonable, meaning it must be backed up by what happened and what a reasonable person would think. In our digital age, misunderstandings can easily happen through text or online communication. Courts are aware of this and look at all available evidence, including messages and social media, to determine what happened. Other avenues of evidence exploration can include CCTV footage and witnesses. Why These Legal Standards Matter The way UK law approaches consent and reasonable belief has changed over time. In the past, people could argue they had an “honest” belief in consent, even if it wasn’t reasonable. That changed with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which now requires honesty and reasonableness. This protects people from harm and ensures that the law takes the experiences and choices of everyone involved seriously. These rules are designed to keep people safe and ensure everyone’s rights are respected. The law encourages open communication, respect, and responsibility. It expects everyone to look for clear signs of agreement and to stop if there is any doubt or hesitation. What To Do If You’re Involved In A Sexual Offence Case Suppose you’re facing a situation involving consent or reasonable belief and you as the accused want to prove that either of these legal requirements existed, then you must seek legal advice and engage with specialist lawyers who can navigate the complexities of the key legal issues in sexual offence cases. These cases can be stressful and complex, and every detail matters: what was said, what was done, and what steps were taken to ensure everyone agreed. At Eventum Legal, we specialise in helping people understand their rights and responsibilities. We listen, explain your options in straightforward language, and support you throughout the process, always with respect and confidentiality.  Whether you’re seeking justice, defending your reputation, or simply want to know your rights, we’re here to help. Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between consent and reasonable belief? Consent is when a person freely agrees to a sexual act. Reasonable belief is whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed that consent was given, based on all the facts. Can someone be convicted if they misunderstood consent? Yes, if their belief in consent wasn’t reasonable. The court looks at the whole situation, not just what the accused thought. How can I protect myself or prove consent? Open communication and ensuring everyone is comfortable and willing are the safest approaches. If you’re worried about misunderstandings, keep records of conversations. Where can I get help or advice? Contact Eventum Legal for confidential, expert support tailored to your needs.
By Sylvie Smith June 5, 2025
Have you been accused of breaching your SHPO, maybe by accident or knowingly? Speak to our specialist team.
More Posts