Parental Alienation: A consequence of Domestic Violence Allegations

Parental alienation is a term commonly used throughout family court proceedings and refers to when one parent sets to brainwash their child to turn them against the other parent and in effect alienates them, causing the child to dislike their other parent and ultimately destroying family relationships. As part of the attempt to brainwash a child behaviour amounting to criminal conduct can be alleged such as physical and/or emotional abuse, financial abuse, sexual abuse and serious assaults. It is most often men affected by parental alienation and coupled with the stress and anxiety of family court proceedings, find themselves also facing a criminal investigation, whether that be in relation to abuse of the child or the mother.


At Eventum Legal we have witnessed the great lengths one parent will go to alienate the other parent, including false allegations of criminal offences including but not limited to domestic and sexual abuse, which have the consequences of police involvement, criminal court proceedings, and court orders which seek to prohibit contact between a parent and their child. These allegations often run alongside family court proceedings and can be used to bolster applications made to the family court whether they concern child arrangements, residency in the family home or for legal aid funding. We often find that when one parent realises allegations of violence or sexual abuse will assist them getting what they want from family proceedings an allegation is subsequently made to the police.


There is no question that efforts made by others to remove a parent from their child’s life is distressing, devastating and emotions ranging from sadness to anger are at a high. Having a legal team on your side who understands this impact and the correlation between such proceedings can make a huge difference to the outcome of the case.

Criminal Allegations Which Can Be Made to Alienate the Other Parent


At Eventum Legal we represent men and women accused of domestic and sexual violence, which often arise together. The  large majority of our clients are male, and they are accused of a variety of offences which from the moment of the    allegation being made prevent them from being involved in their child’s life, whether in part or in full. This restriction can be legally enforceable via bail conditions, Domestic Violence Protection Notices (DVPNs) Domestic Violence Protection Orders (DVPOs), and if convicted more long-term orders              which can lead to prohibitions lasting years.


With a combined experience of 25 years our team know exactly how this impacts our clients both mentally and          physically often leading to a severe decline in their health. The breakdown of a parent and child relationship is a severe consequence of false allegations being made within a family setting, but apply a pro active approach to defending the allegations is advised to enable you to carry on with life as normally as possible.


Allegations which we commonly deal with include,
assault, non-fatal strangulation, rape, sexual assault, child sexual abuse and controlling or coercive behaviour. All very serious allegations which can result in custodial sentences where a person is convicted.

The Impact of Criminal Proceedings on Family Court Proceedings and Vice Versa


Although criminal allegations are dealt with by different courts with different rules in place to regulate and oversee proceedings, there can be a considerable overlap between criminal and family proceedings.


In any legal proceedings, it is essential to accurately establish the facts of the case. However, this can be especially challenging when cases involve both criminal and family law proceedings. This is because the two types of cases often involve different types of evidence and standards of proof. For example, in a criminal proceeding, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty, while in a family law proceeding, the burden of proof is lower meaning that a family court could find that an allegation of criminal behaviour has taken place, whereas the person may not be convicted in the criminal courts. Therefore, the benefit of having two lawyers involved where two sets of proceedings are running alongside each other is essential to ensure a consistent approach is taken, and conflicts over evidence being produced in each proceedings are avoided. The last thing an accused wants is for evidence to be presented in family proceedings which is ultimately going to damage their defence in criminal proceedings.


It is also important to note that family court documents cannot be released for criminal proceedings without the permission of the family judge. Therefore, an application must be made by your criminal lawyers to request the relevant papers. Due to the nature of the work that we do at Eventum Legal our team are experienced in liaising with the family courts where necessary in order to defend our client and obtain the required papers.

What Should you Do?


If you are under investigation for an alleged offence that is made by a person closely connected to you such as an ex-partner, mother to your children, or a child of the family then seeking legal advice is crucial. If these allegations also form part of applications made in family court proceedings, then having specialist lawyers from each field working together is advised. The benefit to this is that your legal interests and rights are protected and there is the assurance that no conflicts arise. Keeping your position safeguarded during both proceedings is crucial.


Case Study


At the moment we are currently working together with a family law team for our client who is accused of rape by his ex-wife who is also mother of his three children. Our client is under police investigation, but Child Arrangements Orders have been made in the family court. The information provided to the family court by his ex-wife have assisted in the criminal proceedings due to the inconsistencies she has provided in various statements throughout.


The family proceedings have concluded much quicker than criminal proceedings but the benefits to the client of having lawyers from both fields working together to assist his case has been hugely beneficial. During the family proceedings we regularly liaised with our client’s family lawyer and proofed their work to ensure that no harm would come to clients criminal defence as a result of family court documents lodged by him .


As we continue to represent the client through the police investigation, we have no doubt that our working relationship with his family law solicitors has benefitted his defence in criminal proceedings. 

How We Can Help You


Our extensive knowledge of how criminal proceedings and family law proceedings overlap provides our clients with the assurance that we know exactly what we are doing when there are ongoing  family and criminal proceedings, both of which require a strong defence to false allegations of a criminal nature.


Protecting our clients interests is paramount and we are alive to the motives that can be behind false allegations which make us best placed for effective representation and support.


Speak to our lawyers confidentially and free of charge today if criminal offences have been alleged against you.




Contact Us

We Can Help With

By Jess Wilson June 13, 2025
Have you been charged with indecent image possession? Do you want to know how many cases get dropped? Read our latest article to learn more.
By Jess Wilson June 11, 2025
Understanding the difference between “consent” and “reasonable belief” can be key if you are being investigated or prosecuted for a sexual offence, where these two issues can arise. These are not just technical legal terms; they are real-world concepts that can affect the outcome of serious sexual abuse cases. At Eventum Legal, our aim is to help people grasp these important ideas so that they know where they stand, whether they’re seeking justice, facing an accusation, or just wanting to be informed. Consent and the Law: What Does It Mean? When it comes to sexual activity, the law makes it very clear that “consent” isn’t just about saying yes or no. Consent means agreeing by choice, having the freedom and capacity to make that choice, and being able to change your mind at any time, even if the sexual activity has begun. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that a person consents if they agree by choice and have the freedom and capacity to do so. In practical terms, this means no one should be pressured, forced, or tricked into sex. If someone is too drunk, too scared, or otherwise unable to decide, they cannot legally give consent. This applies also to issues with mental capacity where someone may not have the understanding or ability to give informed consent. When establishing whether consent or reasonable belief applies, the courts examine everything that happened, how the people involved acted, what was said, their relationship, and whether any threats were made. It’s not about just hearing a yes or no, but about whether the agreement was truly given, freely and knowingly, at the time. Reasonable Belief: The Other Side of the Coin While “consent” focuses on the person on the receiving end of sexual activity, “reasonable belief” is about the perspective of the person accused of the crime. UK law says it’s not enough for someone to claim they thought the other person was consenting. The belief that consent existed must be reasonable; it must meet the standard of what a reasonable person would think in those circumstances. This comes down to two questions: did the accused genuinely believe the other person was consenting, and would a reasonable person, knowing what the accused knew and considering everything that happened, have reached the same conclusion? It’s not a defence to say, “I just thought it was okay,” if evidence, actions, or common sense didn’t back that belief up. Courts look at whether the accused checked for consent, paid attention to what was happening, and took steps to make sure everything was agreed upon. How the Law Applies These Concepts The distinction between consent and reasonable belief matters because everyone is responsible for ensuring that consent is present, not just assuming or hoping it is. The prosecution in a sexual offence case has to prove that there was no consent or that the accused did not have a reasonable belief that consent existed. To judge this, courts examine the context: Were both people sober and able to make decisions? Was there clear, positive agreement? Did one person ignore signs of hesitation or discomfort? In cases where someone is very intoxicated or unable to communicate, the law presumes that there is no consent, and it is challenging for anyone to claim a reasonable belief otherwise. However, where alcohol is in question the issue can become complex as we all have difference alcohol tolerances, what may be too drunk to one person, could be different to the other. Therefore, working to establish the intoxication and affect is crucial for lawyers in some cases. In cases where it can be proven that that someone was too drunk to speak or move, and the accused says they thought there was consent just because the person didn’t say “no,” the court is unlikely to accept that as reasonable. The law expects people to check in with their partner, look for positive signs, and stop if there’s any doubt. Clearing Up Common Myths Many misunderstandings exist about how consent and reasonable belief work in real life. One myth is that if someone doesn’t say “no,” they must have agreed. The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” Another myth is that if two people are in a relationship or have had sex before, consent is always assumed. Every sexual act requires consent, every time. Some people also believe that as long as they honestly thought there was consent, that’s enough. But the law sets a higher bar: the belief has to be reasonable, meaning it must be backed up by what happened and what a reasonable person would think. In our digital age, misunderstandings can easily happen through text or online communication. Courts are aware of this and look at all available evidence, including messages and social media, to determine what happened. Other avenues of evidence exploration can include CCTV footage and witnesses. Why These Legal Standards Matter The way UK law approaches consent and reasonable belief has changed over time. In the past, people could argue they had an “honest” belief in consent, even if it wasn’t reasonable. That changed with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which now requires honesty and reasonableness. This protects people from harm and ensures that the law takes the experiences and choices of everyone involved seriously. These rules are designed to keep people safe and ensure everyone’s rights are respected. The law encourages open communication, respect, and responsibility. It expects everyone to look for clear signs of agreement and to stop if there is any doubt or hesitation. What To Do If You’re Involved In A Sexual Offence Case Suppose you’re facing a situation involving consent or reasonable belief and you as the accused want to prove that either of these legal requirements existed, then you must seek legal advice and engage with specialist lawyers who can navigate the complexities of the key legal issues in sexual offence cases. These cases can be stressful and complex, and every detail matters: what was said, what was done, and what steps were taken to ensure everyone agreed. At Eventum Legal, we specialise in helping people understand their rights and responsibilities. We listen, explain your options in straightforward language, and support you throughout the process, always with respect and confidentiality.  Whether you’re seeking justice, defending your reputation, or simply want to know your rights, we’re here to help. Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between consent and reasonable belief? Consent is when a person freely agrees to a sexual act. Reasonable belief is whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed that consent was given, based on all the facts. Can someone be convicted if they misunderstood consent? Yes, if their belief in consent wasn’t reasonable. The court looks at the whole situation, not just what the accused thought. How can I protect myself or prove consent? Open communication and ensuring everyone is comfortable and willing are the safest approaches. If you’re worried about misunderstandings, keep records of conversations. Where can I get help or advice? Contact Eventum Legal for confidential, expert support tailored to your needs.
By Sylvie Smith June 5, 2025
Have you been accused of breaching your SHPO, maybe by accident or knowingly? Speak to our specialist team.
More Posts