Sentencing for Indecent Image Offences

Sentencing for Indecent Image Offences 

 In light of the Huw Edwards sentencing on 16th September, we have put together a short guide to sentence for Indecent Image Offences

If you are convicted of an indecent image offence, the court is likely to adjourn your case for sentence. This means you will not be sentenced on the same day that you have been found guilty, or pleaded guilty, this often due to the court ordering a Pre Sentence Report (PSR). The time between conviction and sentence also allows for you and your defence team to prepare strong mitigation to present to the court the purpose of which will be to ensure you receive the most lenient possible sentence in your circumstances. 

In this blog we explain the sentencing process for indecent image offences and what orders the court will look at making in addition to the punitive element of the sentence. 

The First Appearance at the Magistrates Court

Following being charged with an indecent image offence, the accused will be given a date to attend the Magistrates Court where they will be expected to enter a plea. If the plea is guilty the case will be adjourned and re listed for sentence. If the plea is not guilty then the case will be listed for a trial to take place. 

Where Will I be Sentenced for an Indecent Image Offence?

An indecent image offence is an either way offence, this means it can be dealt with by the Magistrates Court or Crown Court. Which court deals with the case depends on the seriousness of the offending. What can increase the seriousness of an indecent image offence are factors such as: 
  • The presence of category A images
  • Large volumes of images
  • Images which depict particularly young children
  • Obvious signs of the use of drugs/alcohol to facilitate the abuse of the child 
  • A distribution element to the offending


What is a Pre Sentence Report?


A Pre Sentence Report, abbreviated to PSR, is a report that is prepared by the Probation Service ahead of sentence. Following the first appearance where a guilty plea is entered, or following a trial where a defendant has been convicted, they will be given a date and time whereby they will meet with a probation officer. There is also the possibility that a stand down report can be ordered, where this happens the defendant will see probation on the same day, and will be sentenced on that day following their assessment with probation., this course of action is rare in indecent image cases.


The purpose of PSR is to assess risk, and following the assessment to provide to the court a sentencing recommendation.  The report will also recommend where appropriate specific courses which the defendant must complete as part of the sentence such as, The Sex Offenders Treatment Programme.


What Sentence will I get for Indecent Image Offences?


Sentence for indecent image offences can range from a community order through to lengthy custodial sentences. The sentence varies based on whether the defendant is convicted of possession, distribution or making indecent images and even then, there are various factors which make the sentencing range wide. The below table provides the sentencing range for each offence. The guidelines used for making, in the sense that the accused has downloaded images are those which are used for possession.

Image Category Possession Distribution Production
Category A Starting Point: 1 year custody Category Range: 26 weeks-3 years' Starting Point: 3 years Category Range 2-5 years' Starting Point: 6 years Category Range: 4- 9 years'
Category B Starting Point: 26 weeks custody Category Range: High level community order - 18 months custody Starting Point: 1 year custody Category Range: 26 weeks - 2 years' custody Starting Point: 4-9 Years' custody Category Range: 1-4 years' custody
Category C Starting Point: High level community order Category Range: Medium level community order - 26 weeks custody Starting Point: 13 weeks' custody Category Range: High level community order - 26 weeks custody Starting Point: 18 months custody Category Range: 1-3 years' custody

The Sex Offenders Register


When a defendant has entered a guilty plea they will be required to attend their local police station, or police station designated by the court to notify the police of their conviction.


The minimum term an adult defendant can be made subject to the Sex Offenders Register following a conviction at court is 5 years.

Disposal Notification Requirement
Adult Youth
Simple Caution 2 years 1 year
Fine 5 years 2.5 years
Community Order/Youth Rehabilitation Order 5 years 2.5 years
Hospital Order without restrictions 7 years 3.5 years
Hospital Order with restrictions Indefinitely Indefinitely
Custodial sentence of 6 months or less 7 years 2.5 years
Custodial sentence of more than 6 months and less than 30 months 10 years 5 years
Custodial sentence of 30 months or more Indefinitely Indefinitely

 

Sexual Harm Prevention Orders


A Sexual Harm Prevention Order is made where the court decides that one is necessary in order to protect the public or a particular group of the public from further sexual harm from the defendant.  Sexual Harm Prevention Orders will seek to prohibit the defendant from particular activities, or can also place positive obligations on a defendant. In indecent image cases where the offences relate to the possession, making, or downloading the images Sexual Harm Prevention Orders will relate to the defendant's use and possession of electronic devices. Restrictions on the accused's contact with children should not be a term within the order, and if this is applied for by the Crown Prosecution Service, it is essential for this to be challenged.


 Sexual Harm Prevention Orders are not mandatory orders and where possible can be avoided.

Mitigation - Preparing for Sentence


When preparing for sentence gathering strong mitigation is hugely beneficial for the defendant and can be what makes a difference between a custodial and non custodial sentence. Often people have relevant circumstances which reduces their culpability, these circumstances can be mental health issues, addiction problems, circumstances which relate to their background and up bringing, it could even be accumulation of many factors. Without preparing evidence of these circumstances, and presenting the mitigation to the court the judge will not know about them.


At Eventum Legal we pride ourselves on the meticulous preparation of all cases, including those where our client has pleaded guilty. Here are some mitigating factors the court will consider:


  • No previous convictions or no relevant/recent convictions
  • Remorse
  • Positive character and/or exemplary conduct (regardless of previous convictions)**
  • Age and/or lack of maturity (which may be applicable to offenders aged 18-25) 
  • Mental disorder or learning disability, particularly where linked to the commission of the offence
  • Demonstration of steps taken to address offending behaviour
  • Physical disability or serious medical condition requiring urgent, intensive or long-term treatment
  • Difficult and/or deprived background or personal circumstances
  • Prospects of or in work, training or education 


Psychological and psychiatric reports are also a consideration where appropriate, in some cases an independent assessment of a defendant's risk can strengthen mitigation and the defence arguments advanced for mitigation.

Attending Court for Sentence


Attending court for any hearing is a daunting experience for anyone, particularly when there is a fear that the accused may not be returning home to their family. Our team have over 15 years experience supporting defendants through the sentencing process, preparing for sentence and ensuring our client and their families are supported. 


Feeling prepared and going into court knowing that you could have not anything more is crucial, having the right legal team behind you is essential in order for you and your case to be prepared.


Sentencing for indecent image offences is not straight forward, our lawyers will ensure that the sentence you receive is as lenient as it possibly can be, and that you are not facing Sexual Harm Prevention Order requirements that are excessive or necessary. 


If you or your friends/family would like to discuss our bespoke approach to sentencing in your case then please contact our lawyers free of charge for an initial consultation. At the end of our consultation we will provide you with an action plan which aims to ensure you know where your case could potentially go and the steps we will take to achieve the best outcome for you.

We Can Help With

By Jess Wilson June 13, 2025
Have you been charged with indecent image possession? Do you want to know how many cases get dropped? Read our latest article to learn more.
By Jess Wilson June 11, 2025
Understanding the difference between “consent” and “reasonable belief” can be key if you are being investigated or prosecuted for a sexual offence, where these two issues can arise. These are not just technical legal terms; they are real-world concepts that can affect the outcome of serious sexual abuse cases. At Eventum Legal, our aim is to help people grasp these important ideas so that they know where they stand, whether they’re seeking justice, facing an accusation, or just wanting to be informed. Consent and the Law: What Does It Mean? When it comes to sexual activity, the law makes it very clear that “consent” isn’t just about saying yes or no. Consent means agreeing by choice, having the freedom and capacity to make that choice, and being able to change your mind at any time, even if the sexual activity has begun. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that a person consents if they agree by choice and have the freedom and capacity to do so. In practical terms, this means no one should be pressured, forced, or tricked into sex. If someone is too drunk, too scared, or otherwise unable to decide, they cannot legally give consent. This applies also to issues with mental capacity where someone may not have the understanding or ability to give informed consent. When establishing whether consent or reasonable belief applies, the courts examine everything that happened, how the people involved acted, what was said, their relationship, and whether any threats were made. It’s not about just hearing a yes or no, but about whether the agreement was truly given, freely and knowingly, at the time. Reasonable Belief: The Other Side of the Coin While “consent” focuses on the person on the receiving end of sexual activity, “reasonable belief” is about the perspective of the person accused of the crime. UK law says it’s not enough for someone to claim they thought the other person was consenting. The belief that consent existed must be reasonable; it must meet the standard of what a reasonable person would think in those circumstances. This comes down to two questions: did the accused genuinely believe the other person was consenting, and would a reasonable person, knowing what the accused knew and considering everything that happened, have reached the same conclusion? It’s not a defence to say, “I just thought it was okay,” if evidence, actions, or common sense didn’t back that belief up. Courts look at whether the accused checked for consent, paid attention to what was happening, and took steps to make sure everything was agreed upon. How the Law Applies These Concepts The distinction between consent and reasonable belief matters because everyone is responsible for ensuring that consent is present, not just assuming or hoping it is. The prosecution in a sexual offence case has to prove that there was no consent or that the accused did not have a reasonable belief that consent existed. To judge this, courts examine the context: Were both people sober and able to make decisions? Was there clear, positive agreement? Did one person ignore signs of hesitation or discomfort? In cases where someone is very intoxicated or unable to communicate, the law presumes that there is no consent, and it is challenging for anyone to claim a reasonable belief otherwise. However, where alcohol is in question the issue can become complex as we all have difference alcohol tolerances, what may be too drunk to one person, could be different to the other. Therefore, working to establish the intoxication and affect is crucial for lawyers in some cases. In cases where it can be proven that that someone was too drunk to speak or move, and the accused says they thought there was consent just because the person didn’t say “no,” the court is unlikely to accept that as reasonable. The law expects people to check in with their partner, look for positive signs, and stop if there’s any doubt. Clearing Up Common Myths Many misunderstandings exist about how consent and reasonable belief work in real life. One myth is that if someone doesn’t say “no,” they must have agreed. The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” Another myth is that if two people are in a relationship or have had sex before, consent is always assumed. Every sexual act requires consent, every time. Some people also believe that as long as they honestly thought there was consent, that’s enough. But the law sets a higher bar: the belief has to be reasonable, meaning it must be backed up by what happened and what a reasonable person would think. In our digital age, misunderstandings can easily happen through text or online communication. Courts are aware of this and look at all available evidence, including messages and social media, to determine what happened. Other avenues of evidence exploration can include CCTV footage and witnesses. Why These Legal Standards Matter The way UK law approaches consent and reasonable belief has changed over time. In the past, people could argue they had an “honest” belief in consent, even if it wasn’t reasonable. That changed with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which now requires honesty and reasonableness. This protects people from harm and ensures that the law takes the experiences and choices of everyone involved seriously. These rules are designed to keep people safe and ensure everyone’s rights are respected. The law encourages open communication, respect, and responsibility. It expects everyone to look for clear signs of agreement and to stop if there is any doubt or hesitation. What To Do If You’re Involved In A Sexual Offence Case Suppose you’re facing a situation involving consent or reasonable belief and you as the accused want to prove that either of these legal requirements existed, then you must seek legal advice and engage with specialist lawyers who can navigate the complexities of the key legal issues in sexual offence cases. These cases can be stressful and complex, and every detail matters: what was said, what was done, and what steps were taken to ensure everyone agreed. At Eventum Legal, we specialise in helping people understand their rights and responsibilities. We listen, explain your options in straightforward language, and support you throughout the process, always with respect and confidentiality.  Whether you’re seeking justice, defending your reputation, or simply want to know your rights, we’re here to help. Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between consent and reasonable belief? Consent is when a person freely agrees to a sexual act. Reasonable belief is whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed that consent was given, based on all the facts. Can someone be convicted if they misunderstood consent? Yes, if their belief in consent wasn’t reasonable. The court looks at the whole situation, not just what the accused thought. How can I protect myself or prove consent? Open communication and ensuring everyone is comfortable and willing are the safest approaches. If you’re worried about misunderstandings, keep records of conversations. Where can I get help or advice? Contact Eventum Legal for confidential, expert support tailored to your needs.
By Sylvie Smith June 5, 2025
Have you been accused of breaching your SHPO, maybe by accident or knowingly? Speak to our specialist team.
More Posts