The Difference Between Indecent Images and Prohibited Images

If you are under investigation for indecent image offences, or you have been charged with an offence the first step to understand exactly what the allegations are, the laws that apply and the types of images which are alleged to be indecent.


In today's digital world the internet opens up endless opportunities for its user, both lawful and unlawful. Advances in technology is offering indecent images of children in various forms some of which involve real abuse images, computer generated images which look very real, and images which are not at all real which can be drawings, painting and even traces. Whether indecent images be photographs, computer generated images, created by the use of AI or even drawn, it is important to know where you stand and how you could possibly defend your case. 


What Is An Indecent Image?


An indecent image is an image which depicts a child under the age of 18 in a sexually explicit way, videos which also contain this imagery will be referred to as moving images or videos.


There are three categories of indecent images; A, B and C. A is the most serious category and involves image or videos displaying penetrative sexual activity with a child. The image does not have to be of an adult and a child it can be two children.


A category B image/video depicts other sexual activity but not penetrative sex.


Category C images/videos are those which may show a child in a sexual pose wearing little or no underwear.


An objective test is applied when considering whether or not an image is indecent, various factors will be considered such as the age of the child and the content of the image or video.


What Offences Could I Be Charged With If Indecent Images Are Found On My Devices?


There are three main offences which relate to the presence of indecent images on a persons device:


Offence 1:   Possession of indecent images of children contrary to section 160 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.


What the prosecution must prove:   Possession is not defined by legislation, instead the law applies the definition provided for in the case of R v Okoro (No. 3) [2018] EWCA Crim 1929: the prosecution must prove that the images are within the accused’s custody or control such that they were capable of accessing them and they must know that they possess the images. The accused need not know that the photographs were indecent.


Offence 2:  Making an indecent image of a child contrary to section 1(1)(a) of the Protection of Children Act 1978.



What the prosecution must prove: Making an image refers to bringing the image into ones possession, there is wife interpretation as to how this can be done, including; 

  • opening an attachment to an email containing an image
  • downloading an image from a website onto a computer screen
  • storing an image in a directory on a computer
  • accessing a pornographic website in which indecent images appeared by way of automatic “pop-up” mechanism
  • receiving an image via social media, even if unsolicited and even if part of a group
  • live-streaming images of children


Making is often the preferred charge in cases as when a device is seized, it may be the case that an image is stored in such a way that it is not possible to say that the suspect possessed it, because it is not accessible to them. Even if it is not accessible, however, the evidence may show that they had knowingly “made” the image.


Offence 3:  Distribution of indecent images contrary to section 1(1)(b) of the Protection of Children Act 1978.


What the prosecution must prove: A person has distributed indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs if they part with possession of it to another person, or if they expose or offer it for acquisition by another person.


All indecent image offences carry the possibility of a custodial sentence, but in most cases, where the offence is a first time offence custody can be avoided with the correct legal advice and representation. Look at the sentencing guidelines for indecent image offences here.


What Is A Prohibited Image?


Being in possession of a prohibited image is a separate offence under
section 62 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. The offence is specific to images which are non photographic or pseudo and includes computer generated images, cartoons, manga images and drawings. The image itself must be pornographic and grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise obscene in character. The law also governs images which displays the following acts:


(a)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with or in the presence of a child;


(b)an act of masturbation by, of, involving or in the presence of a child;


(c)an act which involves penetration of the vagina or anus of a child with a part of a person's body or with anything else;


(d)an act of penetration, in the presence of a child, of the vagina or anus of a person with a part of a person's body or with anything else;


(e)the performance by a child of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary);


(f)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary) in the presence of a child


It may be a surprise to some that drawn images and cartoons can constitute unlawful images and by being in possession of them you could face up to three years imprisonment.


Indecent Images Vs Prohibited Images


In summary a person would be charged with an indecent image offence if they have, and it can be proven that they have, possessed, made or distributed a sexually explicit photograph/pseudo photograph or video of a child. With the development of computer technology and AI the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) are very aware that computer generated images can look very real and in these circumstances they are able to issue charges on the basis that the photo looks so real it must be considered as such.


Prohibited images are not real images however they portray acts which make them obscene, offensive and disgusting to any reasonable person and therefore, the law has intervened to make the possession of such material unlawful. It may be surprising to suddenly be arrested because of cartoon, magna drawings or paintings of indecent material, but this too is a serious offence.

Defences To Being In Possession Of A Prohibited Image


Section 64 of the Criminal Justice Act 2009 provides defences for the offence of being in possession of a prohibited image and includes the defences:


1.Legitimate reason for being in

possession of that image.


2. that the person had not seen the image concerned and did not                     know, nor had any cause to suspect, it to be a prohibited image of a             child;


3. that the person-


(i)was sent the image concerned without any prior request having been      made by or on behalf of the person, and


(ii)did not keep it for an unreasonable time.


What To Do If You Have Been Accused Of Possessing or Downloading Indecent Images


The first step is to seek legal advice and support, it is vital you speak with a specialist criminal defence lawyer with experience in defending indecent image offences. Navigating the complexities of a case which centres around forensic evidence can be difficult, and doing this when fighting the emotions of being accused only adds to your distress. Our team take a very robust a pragmatic approach to analysing evidence in indecent image cases. With years of experience in this area we are able to consider and identify forensic issues and defences for our client whilst offering the support needed to get them through difficult investigations and proceedings.


Our team will take the time to sit and explain your case to you, guiding you at every stage so you can make the best and most informed decision for your future. Safeguarding you from reputational damage and unlawful investigations or prosecution, you can be assured that our lawyers will be by your side to fight your corner.


If you would like to discuss your case you can speak to a member of our team at anytime by calling us on 0161 706 0602 or leaving an enquiry in on our contact us page and we will get in touch at your convenience.


Lets defend your position together.


Contact Our Team

We Can Help With

By Jess Wilson June 13, 2025
Have you been charged with indecent image possession? Do you want to know how many cases get dropped? Read our latest article to learn more.
By Jess Wilson June 11, 2025
Understanding the difference between “consent” and “reasonable belief” can be key if you are being investigated or prosecuted for a sexual offence, where these two issues can arise. These are not just technical legal terms; they are real-world concepts that can affect the outcome of serious sexual abuse cases. At Eventum Legal, our aim is to help people grasp these important ideas so that they know where they stand, whether they’re seeking justice, facing an accusation, or just wanting to be informed. Consent and the Law: What Does It Mean? When it comes to sexual activity, the law makes it very clear that “consent” isn’t just about saying yes or no. Consent means agreeing by choice, having the freedom and capacity to make that choice, and being able to change your mind at any time, even if the sexual activity has begun. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that a person consents if they agree by choice and have the freedom and capacity to do so. In practical terms, this means no one should be pressured, forced, or tricked into sex. If someone is too drunk, too scared, or otherwise unable to decide, they cannot legally give consent. This applies also to issues with mental capacity where someone may not have the understanding or ability to give informed consent. When establishing whether consent or reasonable belief applies, the courts examine everything that happened, how the people involved acted, what was said, their relationship, and whether any threats were made. It’s not about just hearing a yes or no, but about whether the agreement was truly given, freely and knowingly, at the time. Reasonable Belief: The Other Side of the Coin While “consent” focuses on the person on the receiving end of sexual activity, “reasonable belief” is about the perspective of the person accused of the crime. UK law says it’s not enough for someone to claim they thought the other person was consenting. The belief that consent existed must be reasonable; it must meet the standard of what a reasonable person would think in those circumstances. This comes down to two questions: did the accused genuinely believe the other person was consenting, and would a reasonable person, knowing what the accused knew and considering everything that happened, have reached the same conclusion? It’s not a defence to say, “I just thought it was okay,” if evidence, actions, or common sense didn’t back that belief up. Courts look at whether the accused checked for consent, paid attention to what was happening, and took steps to make sure everything was agreed upon. How the Law Applies These Concepts The distinction between consent and reasonable belief matters because everyone is responsible for ensuring that consent is present, not just assuming or hoping it is. The prosecution in a sexual offence case has to prove that there was no consent or that the accused did not have a reasonable belief that consent existed. To judge this, courts examine the context: Were both people sober and able to make decisions? Was there clear, positive agreement? Did one person ignore signs of hesitation or discomfort? In cases where someone is very intoxicated or unable to communicate, the law presumes that there is no consent, and it is challenging for anyone to claim a reasonable belief otherwise. However, where alcohol is in question the issue can become complex as we all have difference alcohol tolerances, what may be too drunk to one person, could be different to the other. Therefore, working to establish the intoxication and affect is crucial for lawyers in some cases. In cases where it can be proven that that someone was too drunk to speak or move, and the accused says they thought there was consent just because the person didn’t say “no,” the court is unlikely to accept that as reasonable. The law expects people to check in with their partner, look for positive signs, and stop if there’s any doubt. Clearing Up Common Myths Many misunderstandings exist about how consent and reasonable belief work in real life. One myth is that if someone doesn’t say “no,” they must have agreed. The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” Another myth is that if two people are in a relationship or have had sex before, consent is always assumed. Every sexual act requires consent, every time. Some people also believe that as long as they honestly thought there was consent, that’s enough. But the law sets a higher bar: the belief has to be reasonable, meaning it must be backed up by what happened and what a reasonable person would think. In our digital age, misunderstandings can easily happen through text or online communication. Courts are aware of this and look at all available evidence, including messages and social media, to determine what happened. Other avenues of evidence exploration can include CCTV footage and witnesses. Why These Legal Standards Matter The way UK law approaches consent and reasonable belief has changed over time. In the past, people could argue they had an “honest” belief in consent, even if it wasn’t reasonable. That changed with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which now requires honesty and reasonableness. This protects people from harm and ensures that the law takes the experiences and choices of everyone involved seriously. These rules are designed to keep people safe and ensure everyone’s rights are respected. The law encourages open communication, respect, and responsibility. It expects everyone to look for clear signs of agreement and to stop if there is any doubt or hesitation. What To Do If You’re Involved In A Sexual Offence Case Suppose you’re facing a situation involving consent or reasonable belief and you as the accused want to prove that either of these legal requirements existed, then you must seek legal advice and engage with specialist lawyers who can navigate the complexities of the key legal issues in sexual offence cases. These cases can be stressful and complex, and every detail matters: what was said, what was done, and what steps were taken to ensure everyone agreed. At Eventum Legal, we specialise in helping people understand their rights and responsibilities. We listen, explain your options in straightforward language, and support you throughout the process, always with respect and confidentiality.  Whether you’re seeking justice, defending your reputation, or simply want to know your rights, we’re here to help. Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between consent and reasonable belief? Consent is when a person freely agrees to a sexual act. Reasonable belief is whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed that consent was given, based on all the facts. Can someone be convicted if they misunderstood consent? Yes, if their belief in consent wasn’t reasonable. The court looks at the whole situation, not just what the accused thought. How can I protect myself or prove consent? Open communication and ensuring everyone is comfortable and willing are the safest approaches. If you’re worried about misunderstandings, keep records of conversations. Where can I get help or advice? Contact Eventum Legal for confidential, expert support tailored to your needs.
By Sylvie Smith June 5, 2025
Have you been accused of breaching your SHPO, maybe by accident or knowingly? Speak to our specialist team.
More Posts