What Is A Sexual Harm Prevention Order?

Understanding SHPOs and Their Impact Under UK Law


A Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) is a crucial legal tool in the UK’s ongoing efforts to protect the public from sexual offences. At Eventum Legal, we understand that legal terminology can often be confusing, especially for those directly affected. 


This article explains exactly what an SHPO is, why it might be imposed, the potential impact on individuals, and the legal options available if you are subject to one.


What Is a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO)?


A sexual harm prevention order (shpo) is a civil order made by a court to restrict the behaviour of someone who is considered to pose a risk of sexual harm. 


Introduced under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, SHPOs are part of a wider legal framework designed to protect individuals and communities from those who may re-offend. 


The order can be made following a conviction for a sexual offence, but it can also be applied in situations where a person has not been convicted but is believed to pose a significant risk.


The Purpose Behind SHPOs


The main purpose of an SHPO is to prevent sexual harm before it occurs. These orders are tailored to the specific risk posed by an individual and can be applied to adults and young people. 


By imposing legally binding restrictions, the authorities aim to disrupt patterns of behaviour that could lead to further offences, ensuring that vulnerable people, particularly children, are protected from harm.


How SHPOs Differ from Previous Orders


Before introducing SHPOs, courts could impose Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPOs) and Foreign Travel Orders. However, SHPOs were introduced to consolidate and improve upon these earlier measures. 


Unlike their predecessors, SHPOs offer greater flexibility and can be applied in a broader range of circumstances, including cases without a formal criminal conviction.


When and Why Are SHPOs Issued?


SHPOs can be issued by a court either at the time of sentencing for a sexual offence or as a standalone civil order if the police or National Crime Agency believe someone poses a significant risk. The law empowers courts to intervene pre-emptively to prevent harm, even when an individual has not been convicted but has demonstrated behaviours or patterns that cause concern.


Who Can Apply for a Sexual Harm Prevention Order?


The police or other law enforcement agencies typically make applications for SHPOs. The application will set out the grounds on which the order is sought, detailing the individual’s previous behaviour and the perceived ongoing risk. 


The subject of the application has the opportunity to respond in court, and a judge will decide whether the order is necessary and proportionate to protect the public or particular individuals from sexual harm.


Typical Scenarios That Lead to an SHPO


Cases that result in an SHPO are diverse. Some orders are made at the point of conviction for offences such as sexual assault, indecent images offences, or child grooming. 


Others arise from intelligence gathered by police that indicates someone is engaging in risky behaviour, such as contacting minors online or visiting places where children are present, without there having been a formal criminal case.


Key Restrictions and Conditions Under an SHPO


SHPOs are tailored to each case and may impose various restrictions. These might include prohibiting an individual from living with children, using certain internet-enabled devices, or travelling to specified locations. The goal is always to address specific risks and to prevent further offending.


Common Prohibitions: What Can Be Restricted?


Typical conditions might include restrictions on contact with children under a certain age, limits on internet access, or bans on visiting particular places such as schools, playgrounds, or leisure centres. 


In some cases, the order might prohibit overseas travel or require the individual to surrender their passport to prevent them from travelling to countries with weaker child protection laws.


Examples of SHPO Conditions In Practice


The conditions attached to an SHPO will vary widely depending on the individual case. For example, someone convicted of online offences may be required to allow police to monitor their electronic devices and online activity. 


Others might be prohibited from undertaking certain types of work, especially unsupervised contact with minors. The flexibility of SHPOs ensures that the court can craft adequate, proportionate safeguards.


How Long Does An SHPO Last?


The length of an SHPO will depend on the specifics of the case. The law sets a minimum term of five years, but in some cases, the order may remain in force indefinitely. The court will consider how long the restrictions are likely to be necessary, bearing in mind both public safety and the individual’s right to a private and family life.


Minimum and Maximum Duration


While the minimum duration is five years, some conditions, such as those relating to foreign travel, may have shorter periods and can be renewed if necessary. In rare cases, an SHPO can remain in effect for life if the risk is deemed ongoing and severe.


Reviewing and Extending an SHPO


An SHPO can be reviewed and varied if circumstances change, but the subject of the order, or the police, must apply to the court for this to happen. The court will only remove or reduce conditions if the risk of harm has diminished sufficiently.


What Happens If You Breach an SHPO?


Breaching the terms of an SHPO is a criminal offence. The police take breaches seriously, and individuals who commit breaches can be arrested and prosecuted. The penalties can be severe if convicted of a breach, including up to five years imprisonment. 

Courts may also impose further restrictions or additional conditions.


Legal Consequences and Penalties


A conviction for breaching an SHPO results in a criminal record and can significantly affect employment, travel, and personal reputation. The court may view a breach as evidence that the individual poses an ongoing risk, making it harder to have the order removed or varied in the future.


Real-World Case Examples


There have been cases where individuals breached their SHPO by accessing the internet without permission or failing to notify police of address changes. In these instances, courts have imposed custodial sentences, reflecting the seriousness with which such breaches are viewed.


How to Challenge, Vary, or Discharge an SHPO


Anyone subject to an SHPO can appeal the order if they believe it is unfair or disproportionate. Appeals from the Magistrates’ Court must be lodged within 21 days, while Crown Court decisions can be challenged in the Court of Appeal. 

It is also possible to apply for a variation or discharge of the order if there is a significant change in circumstances.


The Appeal Process Explained


An appeal or application for variation will involve a hearing before a judge, where the individual and the police can present evidence. The court will decide whether the SHPO remains necessary and proportionate.


When and How Orders Can Be Changed or Removed


The court can remove or adjust the conditions of an SHPO if it is satisfied that the level of risk has changed. However, the minimum period before discharge is generally five years, unless both parties agree otherwise.


The Impact Of An SHPO On Daily Life


Being subject to an SHPO has far-reaching consequences. Many individuals find that employment opportunities are limited, particularly in roles involving children or vulnerable adults. Travel can be restricted, and the order must be disclosed in certain circumstances, including job applications and visa requests.


Employment and Travel Restrictions


Employers and authorities may be informed of an SHPO, which can affect job prospects. International travel is often limited, especially if the order includes a travel restriction.


SHPOs and Disclosure: What Must Be Declared?


The existence of an SHPO forms part of an individual’s criminal record and must be declared when required by law. This can have ongoing effects on personal and professional life.



Frequently Asked Questions About SHPOs


We are often asked whether SHPOs are permanent, how they can be challenged, and what steps can be taken to mitigate their effects. Each case is unique, and our team at Eventum Legal can provide tailored advice based on individual circumstances.


How Eventum Legal Can Help With Sexual Harm Prevention Orders


If you or a loved one is subject to a sexual Harassment Prevention Order or is concerned that you might become the subject of one, our experienced legal team is here to help. We offer confidential advice, representation in court, and ongoing support throughout the process. 


At Eventum Legal, we are committed to safeguarding your rights while ensuring compliance with the law. We work tirelessly to achieve the best possible outcome for every client.


We Can Help With

By Jess Wilson June 13, 2025
Have you been charged with indecent image possession? Do you want to know how many cases get dropped? Read our latest article to learn more.
By Jess Wilson June 11, 2025
Understanding the difference between “consent” and “reasonable belief” can be key if you are being investigated or prosecuted for a sexual offence, where these two issues can arise. These are not just technical legal terms; they are real-world concepts that can affect the outcome of serious sexual abuse cases. At Eventum Legal, our aim is to help people grasp these important ideas so that they know where they stand, whether they’re seeking justice, facing an accusation, or just wanting to be informed. Consent and the Law: What Does It Mean? When it comes to sexual activity, the law makes it very clear that “consent” isn’t just about saying yes or no. Consent means agreeing by choice, having the freedom and capacity to make that choice, and being able to change your mind at any time, even if the sexual activity has begun. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that a person consents if they agree by choice and have the freedom and capacity to do so. In practical terms, this means no one should be pressured, forced, or tricked into sex. If someone is too drunk, too scared, or otherwise unable to decide, they cannot legally give consent. This applies also to issues with mental capacity where someone may not have the understanding or ability to give informed consent. When establishing whether consent or reasonable belief applies, the courts examine everything that happened, how the people involved acted, what was said, their relationship, and whether any threats were made. It’s not about just hearing a yes or no, but about whether the agreement was truly given, freely and knowingly, at the time. Reasonable Belief: The Other Side of the Coin While “consent” focuses on the person on the receiving end of sexual activity, “reasonable belief” is about the perspective of the person accused of the crime. UK law says it’s not enough for someone to claim they thought the other person was consenting. The belief that consent existed must be reasonable; it must meet the standard of what a reasonable person would think in those circumstances. This comes down to two questions: did the accused genuinely believe the other person was consenting, and would a reasonable person, knowing what the accused knew and considering everything that happened, have reached the same conclusion? It’s not a defence to say, “I just thought it was okay,” if evidence, actions, or common sense didn’t back that belief up. Courts look at whether the accused checked for consent, paid attention to what was happening, and took steps to make sure everything was agreed upon. How the Law Applies These Concepts The distinction between consent and reasonable belief matters because everyone is responsible for ensuring that consent is present, not just assuming or hoping it is. The prosecution in a sexual offence case has to prove that there was no consent or that the accused did not have a reasonable belief that consent existed. To judge this, courts examine the context: Were both people sober and able to make decisions? Was there clear, positive agreement? Did one person ignore signs of hesitation or discomfort? In cases where someone is very intoxicated or unable to communicate, the law presumes that there is no consent, and it is challenging for anyone to claim a reasonable belief otherwise. However, where alcohol is in question the issue can become complex as we all have difference alcohol tolerances, what may be too drunk to one person, could be different to the other. Therefore, working to establish the intoxication and affect is crucial for lawyers in some cases. In cases where it can be proven that that someone was too drunk to speak or move, and the accused says they thought there was consent just because the person didn’t say “no,” the court is unlikely to accept that as reasonable. The law expects people to check in with their partner, look for positive signs, and stop if there’s any doubt. Clearing Up Common Myths Many misunderstandings exist about how consent and reasonable belief work in real life. One myth is that if someone doesn’t say “no,” they must have agreed. The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” Another myth is that if two people are in a relationship or have had sex before, consent is always assumed. Every sexual act requires consent, every time. Some people also believe that as long as they honestly thought there was consent, that’s enough. But the law sets a higher bar: the belief has to be reasonable, meaning it must be backed up by what happened and what a reasonable person would think. In our digital age, misunderstandings can easily happen through text or online communication. Courts are aware of this and look at all available evidence, including messages and social media, to determine what happened. Other avenues of evidence exploration can include CCTV footage and witnesses. Why These Legal Standards Matter The way UK law approaches consent and reasonable belief has changed over time. In the past, people could argue they had an “honest” belief in consent, even if it wasn’t reasonable. That changed with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which now requires honesty and reasonableness. This protects people from harm and ensures that the law takes the experiences and choices of everyone involved seriously. These rules are designed to keep people safe and ensure everyone’s rights are respected. The law encourages open communication, respect, and responsibility. It expects everyone to look for clear signs of agreement and to stop if there is any doubt or hesitation. What To Do If You’re Involved In A Sexual Offence Case Suppose you’re facing a situation involving consent or reasonable belief and you as the accused want to prove that either of these legal requirements existed, then you must seek legal advice and engage with specialist lawyers who can navigate the complexities of the key legal issues in sexual offence cases. These cases can be stressful and complex, and every detail matters: what was said, what was done, and what steps were taken to ensure everyone agreed. At Eventum Legal, we specialise in helping people understand their rights and responsibilities. We listen, explain your options in straightforward language, and support you throughout the process, always with respect and confidentiality.  Whether you’re seeking justice, defending your reputation, or simply want to know your rights, we’re here to help. Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between consent and reasonable belief? Consent is when a person freely agrees to a sexual act. Reasonable belief is whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed that consent was given, based on all the facts. Can someone be convicted if they misunderstood consent? Yes, if their belief in consent wasn’t reasonable. The court looks at the whole situation, not just what the accused thought. How can I protect myself or prove consent? Open communication and ensuring everyone is comfortable and willing are the safest approaches. If you’re worried about misunderstandings, keep records of conversations. Where can I get help or advice? Contact Eventum Legal for confidential, expert support tailored to your needs.
By Sylvie Smith June 5, 2025
Have you been accused of breaching your SHPO, maybe by accident or knowingly? Speak to our specialist team.
More Posts