Will I Get My Legal Costs Back If I Am Found Not Guilty?
Will I Get My Legal Fees Back If I Am Found Not Guilty?
Contact Our Team
Preparing for criminal proceedings is stressful and upsetting without the added pressure as to how you are going fund your legal representation. At Eventum Legal we empathise with the financial strain legal services can place on the accused and their families and do our upmost to work with you when it comes to funding your defence.
An initial question from many of our clients is whether they will be able to claim back their legal costs if they are found not guilty. Claiming your legal costs back if you are found not guilty is possible in certain circumstances, but ultimately the decision as to whether you are entitled to any of your legal costs back would be that of the court at the conclusion of your trial, following an application for wasted costs.
It is important at the outset of your case to establish the likely costs involved at various stages of proceedings, and also your entitlement to any assistance with legal fees through Legal Aid.
Legal Cost Considerations in Criminal Proceedings
Depending on the nature of your case you may have various costs to consider, your lawyers fees, barrister fees where one is required to represent you at Court, and any fees you may incur if a defence expert witness is required to prepare a report, such as; psychology/psychiatric reports, reports involving a particular area of medical expertise, toxicology experts, and or digital and CCTV forensic experts. Therefore, there is not one set cost for all cases, legal costs vary based on the work that is required to defend your case.
If you are funding your case privately you will be responsible for meeting the costs, and we understand the additional anxiety and stress that can be caused by having to do this. Therefore, ensuring we do our very best to obtain some if not all of your costs back for you at the conclusion of your case is a consideration we have throughout our representation of you.
Who Will Pay My Cost Back If I Am Found Not Guilty?
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) would be ordered by the court to pay your costs however, the CPS is not a party in the same way individuals or companies are in civil disputes, because the CPS represents the public interest, not a private one. Therefore, even if you are found 'not guilty', the court does not automatically order the CPS to pay your legal costs. An application has to be made by your legal team, and even then it is at the judges discretion as to whether any expenses are returned to you.
The court has a range of options at its discretion when it comes to awarding costs. For example, you might be found 'not guilty' of one charge but guilty of another. In such cases, the court will weigh various factors to decide whether you should be granted a Defence Costs Order to recover some or all of your legal expenses.
Even if you are acquitted, the court may consider other factors like the reasonableness of the costs you have incurred and your conduct during the case. Did you cooperate fully with the investigation? Were there any actions or decisions you took that unnecessarily complicated the case or increased costs? The court might find you responsible for covering these expenses yourself.
Circumstances Where you May be Eligible to Get Your Costs Back in a Criminal Case
If you are acquitted of a sexual offence
or an offence of domestic abuse
you may be eligible to claim back your legal costs through what is known as a 'Defence Costs Order'. This order allows you to recover some of your legal costs. However, it is not automatic and there are conditions that must be met.
Firstly, you must be acquitted or have your case dismissed or discontinued to be eligible for the Order. If you are found guilty, even on a lesser charge, this option is generally not available.
Your behaviour and cooperation during the investigation and trial can also impact your ability to claim back costs. For example, if you have been found to have obstructed the investigation or provided false information, the court may be less inclined to award you a Defence Costs Order.
Timing can also be a factor. If you have incurred costs due to delays that were not your fault, such as postponements by the court or the prosecution, these costs may be more readily recoverable.
How Do I Claim My Legal Costs Back?
At the conclusion of your trial your defence team should guide you on making an application for a Defence Costs Order. There are steps that must be taken.
1. The court must be informed that you wish to apply for wasted costs.
2. A cost schedule must be provided to the court by your lawyers. This sets out the fees paid, and the work carried out in your case.
3. The court will consider the application, and an oral hearing is likely to be held where the application is not agreed by the CPS.
There are two pathways which can be used to claim back costs:
An application under section 16 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. This allows a defendant to obtain costs from central funds, meaning the amount paid back to the defendant would be paid at Legal Aid rates, even where the defendant may have incurred costs which are substantially more.
An application under section 19 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985
can be made for full costs in any case where the court is satisfied that one party to criminal proceedings has incurred costs as a result of an unnecessary or improper act or omission by, or on behalf of, another party to the proceedings, to make an order as to the payment of those costs.
Whether or not you have applied for legal aid can impact the application for wasted costs. Applying for legal aid, even where you know you may be refused can be helpful for wasted costs applications when a case has been funded privately. It is important you discuss this with your lawyer during your initial consultations with them.
How will the Court Decide If I Get My Legal Costs Back?
The court will assess and scrutinise the application for costs submitted by your legal team and consider whether the expenses claimed are reasonable taking into their considerations any overly complex issues in the case and any delays that were caused to proceedings by the prosecution.
How We Can Help You?
Transparency on costs is paramount, what we do not want is for you to be navigating your case and being continuously hit with invoices that were never anticipated at the outset, as many law firms do.
Once we have established fees at the outset we can then move to work on building your defence. In some cases fees can arise which were not anticipated at the beginning of the case, but this is something we would provide you with advice on initially, and work with you to ensure you are not surprised if they arise.
Throughout your case all of our work will be accurately recorded so that when it comes to determine your costs for an application for wasted cost we can get as much as possible returned to you.
Upon the conclusion of your case we will always assess your eligibility for a defence costs order. If you wish for us to do so we would make an application for costs and prepare clear and strong schedules to justify your legal expenses.
If you would like to discuss funding your case, and getting back your legal costs at the conclusion then contact our lawyers
for a free initial consultation, we will be happy to help you.
We Can Help With
Have you been charged with indecent image possession? Do you want to know how many cases get dropped? Read our latest article to learn more.
Understanding the difference between “consent” and “reasonable belief” can be key if you are being investigated or prosecuted for a sexual offence, where these two issues can arise. These are not just technical legal terms; they are real-world concepts that can affect the outcome of serious sexual abuse cases. At Eventum Legal, our aim is to help people grasp these important ideas so that they know where they stand, whether they’re seeking justice, facing an accusation, or just wanting to be informed. Consent and the Law: What Does It Mean? When it comes to sexual activity, the law makes it very clear that “consent” isn’t just about saying yes or no. Consent means agreeing by choice, having the freedom and capacity to make that choice, and being able to change your mind at any time, even if the sexual activity has begun. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that a person consents if they agree by choice and have the freedom and capacity to do so. In practical terms, this means no one should be pressured, forced, or tricked into sex. If someone is too drunk, too scared, or otherwise unable to decide, they cannot legally give consent. This applies also to issues with mental capacity where someone may not have the understanding or ability to give informed consent. When establishing whether consent or reasonable belief applies, the courts examine everything that happened, how the people involved acted, what was said, their relationship, and whether any threats were made. It’s not about just hearing a yes or no, but about whether the agreement was truly given, freely and knowingly, at the time. Reasonable Belief: The Other Side of the Coin While “consent” focuses on the person on the receiving end of sexual activity, “reasonable belief” is about the perspective of the person accused of the crime. UK law says it’s not enough for someone to claim they thought the other person was consenting. The belief that consent existed must be reasonable; it must meet the standard of what a reasonable person would think in those circumstances. This comes down to two questions: did the accused genuinely believe the other person was consenting, and would a reasonable person, knowing what the accused knew and considering everything that happened, have reached the same conclusion? It’s not a defence to say, “I just thought it was okay,” if evidence, actions, or common sense didn’t back that belief up. Courts look at whether the accused checked for consent, paid attention to what was happening, and took steps to make sure everything was agreed upon. How the Law Applies These Concepts The distinction between consent and reasonable belief matters because everyone is responsible for ensuring that consent is present, not just assuming or hoping it is. The prosecution in a sexual offence case has to prove that there was no consent or that the accused did not have a reasonable belief that consent existed. To judge this, courts examine the context: Were both people sober and able to make decisions? Was there clear, positive agreement? Did one person ignore signs of hesitation or discomfort? In cases where someone is very intoxicated or unable to communicate, the law presumes that there is no consent, and it is challenging for anyone to claim a reasonable belief otherwise. However, where alcohol is in question the issue can become complex as we all have difference alcohol tolerances, what may be too drunk to one person, could be different to the other. Therefore, working to establish the intoxication and affect is crucial for lawyers in some cases. In cases where it can be proven that that someone was too drunk to speak or move, and the accused says they thought there was consent just because the person didn’t say “no,” the court is unlikely to accept that as reasonable. The law expects people to check in with their partner, look for positive signs, and stop if there’s any doubt. Clearing Up Common Myths Many misunderstandings exist about how consent and reasonable belief work in real life. One myth is that if someone doesn’t say “no,” they must have agreed. The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” Another myth is that if two people are in a relationship or have had sex before, consent is always assumed. Every sexual act requires consent, every time. Some people also believe that as long as they honestly thought there was consent, that’s enough. But the law sets a higher bar: the belief has to be reasonable, meaning it must be backed up by what happened and what a reasonable person would think. In our digital age, misunderstandings can easily happen through text or online communication. Courts are aware of this and look at all available evidence, including messages and social media, to determine what happened. Other avenues of evidence exploration can include CCTV footage and witnesses. Why These Legal Standards Matter The way UK law approaches consent and reasonable belief has changed over time. In the past, people could argue they had an “honest” belief in consent, even if it wasn’t reasonable. That changed with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which now requires honesty and reasonableness. This protects people from harm and ensures that the law takes the experiences and choices of everyone involved seriously. These rules are designed to keep people safe and ensure everyone’s rights are respected. The law encourages open communication, respect, and responsibility. It expects everyone to look for clear signs of agreement and to stop if there is any doubt or hesitation. What To Do If You’re Involved In A Sexual Offence Case Suppose you’re facing a situation involving consent or reasonable belief and you as the accused want to prove that either of these legal requirements existed, then you must seek legal advice and engage with specialist lawyers who can navigate the complexities of the key legal issues in sexual offence cases. These cases can be stressful and complex, and every detail matters: what was said, what was done, and what steps were taken to ensure everyone agreed. At Eventum Legal, we specialise in helping people understand their rights and responsibilities. We listen, explain your options in straightforward language, and support you throughout the process, always with respect and confidentiality. Whether you’re seeking justice, defending your reputation, or simply want to know your rights, we’re here to help. Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between consent and reasonable belief? Consent is when a person freely agrees to a sexual act. Reasonable belief is whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed that consent was given, based on all the facts. Can someone be convicted if they misunderstood consent? Yes, if their belief in consent wasn’t reasonable. The court looks at the whole situation, not just what the accused thought. How can I protect myself or prove consent? Open communication and ensuring everyone is comfortable and willing are the safest approaches. If you’re worried about misunderstandings, keep records of conversations. Where can I get help or advice? Contact Eventum Legal for confidential, expert support tailored to your needs.
Have you been accused of breaching your SHPO, maybe by accident or knowingly? Speak to our specialist team.
