Case Success: Sexual Harm Prevention Order Refused in a Case Concerning Sexual Activity with a Child

Our client has avoided a Sexual Harm Prevention Order being made against him, following conviction for the offence of sexual activity with a child.  This has enabled our client to return to his family home and be involved in his daughters life, something the police and Social Services had done everything possible to prevent. 

Whilst represented by his previous legal team our client was unfortunately convicted after trial in the Magistrates Court of Sexual  Activity with a Child contrary to section 9 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. We were instructed after the trial to appeal this conviction and to represent our client at his sentencing hearing. Efforts were made to adjourn sentence pending the outcome of appeal but the court proceeded to sentence which they were entitled to do. 

We prepared the client's case for sentence whilst liaising with the Crown Court regarding the appeal. 

The offence

Sexual Activity with a child is an offence contrary to section 9 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. This particular case related to an allegation against our client that he had inappropriately touched a girl’s thigh and caused her to kiss him on the lips. The complainant was 14 years old and was known to our client. The offence is alleged to have taken place in a busy football stadium surrounded by other people, CCTV and the football stewards. There were no eyewitnesses. 

The allegation was made immediately when the complainant left the stands to go to the toilet, whilst away from our client and other family members and friends the complainant made a phone call to her mother who she made those initial disclosures to. 
Our client was subsequently arrested, interviewed and charged. During this process the duty solicitor was used under the Legal Aid Scheme. He denied all allegations made against him. 

Sentence 

The maximum sentence that the court could impose in this instance was 6 months imprisonment. If the case was sent to the Crown Court the maximum sentence increases greatly to 14 years imprisonment, but this is of course a sentence reserved for the most serious section 9 offences. The minimum sentence that could be imposed in such a case is a low level community order. 

In addition to the punitive element of the sentence the court must consider, upon application from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), whether or not a Sexual Harm Prevention Order is required. In this case an application for a SHPO was made, and in addition a Football Banning Order, which would prevent our client from attending football matches. 

What is a Sexual Harm Prevention Order?


A Sexual Harm Prevention Order is commonly made in cases which concern sexual offending and where the offence is listed within schedule 3 or 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. A section 9 offence is listed within schedule 3.


The purpose of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order is to protect the public or a certain group of the public from further sexual harm caused by the defendant section 103A(2) Sexual Offences Act 2003.


To make a Sexual Harm Prevention Order the court must be satisfied that the defendant presents a risk of sexual harm, and that an order is necessary to prevent this harm.


In our case, the consideration was whether the defendant posed a risk of sexual harm to children. The details of the case are a key factor when the courts are considering a SHPO together with any previous convictions and the assessment of risk presented by the Probation Service. The proposed prohibitions in our case looked to prevent contact with children (including our client’s own child) without the supervision of someone who is aware of the offence, amongst other prohibitions this was the main one which would have caused our client and his family severe upset and disruption. 

Football Banning Order


A Football Banning Order Application was also made in this case by the CPS against our client. Their argument was that violence should include sexual violence. Following submissions by the defence, that sexual offending certainly did not fall into the category of offending in which Football Banning Orders were aimed to prevent, the court agreed not to make such an order.


Our Client’s Sentence


At court our client was represented by his barrister, Mr Damian Warburton of Holborn Chambers who we instructed to represent our client. Damian advanced legal arguments in respect of both the SHPO application and the Football Banning Order, the Magistrates agreed with the defence and refused both applications made by the CPS. The court concluded with a sentence of a 12-month community order. This will require our client to undertake a certain number of hours of unpaid work, a Rehabilitation Activity Requirement, and a low amount of prosecution costs. 


We will now continue to prepare our client's case for appeal against conviction in the Crown Court.

How we Can Help You


In all cases we take the initial view of working with our client to avoid conviction, however, where a client pleads guilty or is convicted after a trial we must proceed to prepare thoroughly for sentence.


Thorough preparation for sentencing of sexual offences can not be underestimated, the Crown Prosecution Service will apply to prohibit a defendant from various every day activities which can have a serious impact on the way in which their lives are lived, these prohibitions can prevent a defendant from their social media use, internet use, device use and contact with their children, or children of family members. But it is important to understand that a SHPO is not mandatory and that they can be challenged.


If you have been made subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention order, or maybe currently under investigation or facing court proceedings where such an order is likely to be applied for, then contact our team to discuss this. We may be able to completely oppose the order, or challenge certain prohibitions to ensure you are not overly restricted. We can also apply the same approach to Sexual Risk Orders, which the police can apply to impose before a charging decision or court proceedings.


Our initial discussion with you is free of charge and strictly confidential. Our friendly team will guide you step by step through the legal process which applies to your case and what we can do represent you and achieve the best possible outcome.


Contact Us

We Can Help With

By Jess Wilson June 13, 2025
Have you been charged with indecent image possession? Do you want to know how many cases get dropped? Read our latest article to learn more.
By Jess Wilson June 11, 2025
Understanding the difference between “consent” and “reasonable belief” can be key if you are being investigated or prosecuted for a sexual offence, where these two issues can arise. These are not just technical legal terms; they are real-world concepts that can affect the outcome of serious sexual abuse cases. At Eventum Legal, our aim is to help people grasp these important ideas so that they know where they stand, whether they’re seeking justice, facing an accusation, or just wanting to be informed. Consent and the Law: What Does It Mean? When it comes to sexual activity, the law makes it very clear that “consent” isn’t just about saying yes or no. Consent means agreeing by choice, having the freedom and capacity to make that choice, and being able to change your mind at any time, even if the sexual activity has begun. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that a person consents if they agree by choice and have the freedom and capacity to do so. In practical terms, this means no one should be pressured, forced, or tricked into sex. If someone is too drunk, too scared, or otherwise unable to decide, they cannot legally give consent. This applies also to issues with mental capacity where someone may not have the understanding or ability to give informed consent. When establishing whether consent or reasonable belief applies, the courts examine everything that happened, how the people involved acted, what was said, their relationship, and whether any threats were made. It’s not about just hearing a yes or no, but about whether the agreement was truly given, freely and knowingly, at the time. Reasonable Belief: The Other Side of the Coin While “consent” focuses on the person on the receiving end of sexual activity, “reasonable belief” is about the perspective of the person accused of the crime. UK law says it’s not enough for someone to claim they thought the other person was consenting. The belief that consent existed must be reasonable; it must meet the standard of what a reasonable person would think in those circumstances. This comes down to two questions: did the accused genuinely believe the other person was consenting, and would a reasonable person, knowing what the accused knew and considering everything that happened, have reached the same conclusion? It’s not a defence to say, “I just thought it was okay,” if evidence, actions, or common sense didn’t back that belief up. Courts look at whether the accused checked for consent, paid attention to what was happening, and took steps to make sure everything was agreed upon. How the Law Applies These Concepts The distinction between consent and reasonable belief matters because everyone is responsible for ensuring that consent is present, not just assuming or hoping it is. The prosecution in a sexual offence case has to prove that there was no consent or that the accused did not have a reasonable belief that consent existed. To judge this, courts examine the context: Were both people sober and able to make decisions? Was there clear, positive agreement? Did one person ignore signs of hesitation or discomfort? In cases where someone is very intoxicated or unable to communicate, the law presumes that there is no consent, and it is challenging for anyone to claim a reasonable belief otherwise. However, where alcohol is in question the issue can become complex as we all have difference alcohol tolerances, what may be too drunk to one person, could be different to the other. Therefore, working to establish the intoxication and affect is crucial for lawyers in some cases. In cases where it can be proven that that someone was too drunk to speak or move, and the accused says they thought there was consent just because the person didn’t say “no,” the court is unlikely to accept that as reasonable. The law expects people to check in with their partner, look for positive signs, and stop if there’s any doubt. Clearing Up Common Myths Many misunderstandings exist about how consent and reasonable belief work in real life. One myth is that if someone doesn’t say “no,” they must have agreed. The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” Another myth is that if two people are in a relationship or have had sex before, consent is always assumed. Every sexual act requires consent, every time. Some people also believe that as long as they honestly thought there was consent, that’s enough. But the law sets a higher bar: the belief has to be reasonable, meaning it must be backed up by what happened and what a reasonable person would think. In our digital age, misunderstandings can easily happen through text or online communication. Courts are aware of this and look at all available evidence, including messages and social media, to determine what happened. Other avenues of evidence exploration can include CCTV footage and witnesses. Why These Legal Standards Matter The way UK law approaches consent and reasonable belief has changed over time. In the past, people could argue they had an “honest” belief in consent, even if it wasn’t reasonable. That changed with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which now requires honesty and reasonableness. This protects people from harm and ensures that the law takes the experiences and choices of everyone involved seriously. These rules are designed to keep people safe and ensure everyone’s rights are respected. The law encourages open communication, respect, and responsibility. It expects everyone to look for clear signs of agreement and to stop if there is any doubt or hesitation. What To Do If You’re Involved In A Sexual Offence Case Suppose you’re facing a situation involving consent or reasonable belief and you as the accused want to prove that either of these legal requirements existed, then you must seek legal advice and engage with specialist lawyers who can navigate the complexities of the key legal issues in sexual offence cases. These cases can be stressful and complex, and every detail matters: what was said, what was done, and what steps were taken to ensure everyone agreed. At Eventum Legal, we specialise in helping people understand their rights and responsibilities. We listen, explain your options in straightforward language, and support you throughout the process, always with respect and confidentiality.  Whether you’re seeking justice, defending your reputation, or simply want to know your rights, we’re here to help. Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between consent and reasonable belief? Consent is when a person freely agrees to a sexual act. Reasonable belief is whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed that consent was given, based on all the facts. Can someone be convicted if they misunderstood consent? Yes, if their belief in consent wasn’t reasonable. The court looks at the whole situation, not just what the accused thought. How can I protect myself or prove consent? Open communication and ensuring everyone is comfortable and willing are the safest approaches. If you’re worried about misunderstandings, keep records of conversations. Where can I get help or advice? Contact Eventum Legal for confidential, expert support tailored to your needs.
By Sylvie Smith June 5, 2025
Have you been accused of breaching your SHPO, maybe by accident or knowingly? Speak to our specialist team.
More Posts