Increase of Domestic Abuse Allegations at Christmas

Domestic abuse   is one of the most commonly reported crimes to the police and there is a surge every year of complaints around Christmas time. Christmas is a time which for many is full of joy and happiness, but for others it can be a period fraught with stress, conflict and vulnerability. The heightened emotions around the holiday season can lead to rash decisions being made by spouses and partners which result in reports to the police of offences amounting to domestic violence.


Domestic violence is a term used which can encompass a wide range of criminal offences including; sexual offences, assault and controlling or coercive behaviour which can be mental, physical, emotional and financial abuse. Our team specialise in defending these very allegations. Our all female legal team represent men and women accused of domestic violence and sexual abuse throughout England and Wales. Most often we represent men, but when working with them to defend their case often identify that in fact the accuser is the abuser, and reports to the police are a form of keeping that control and inflicting abuse. Despite the small recognition given to men who suffer domestic abuse, the offence is still very much subject to gender bias.


What Causes the Increase in Domestic Violence Allegations over the Holiday Season?


All relationships are unique, and our cases vary but a common theme is present throughout allegations which are made around and as a result of the Christmas period.


Financial Strain


The financial pressures of gift giving, holiday meals and travel can create significant stress for families, particularly for those already struggling to make ends meet. This strain can sometimes escalate tensions, leading to arguments and violent outbursts.


Increased Alcohol Consumption


Festivities can often involve high alcohol intake, which can impair judgements, lower inhibitions, and exacerbate underlying tensions in relationships.


Heightened Emotional Stress


The holidays can amplify feelings of loneliness, unresolved family conflict or the weight of societal expectation, leading to frustration and anger.


Spending More Time Together


Families spending prolonged periods together in confined spaces, often with unrealistic expectations of harmony, can lead to conflicts escalating into violence.


The Consequences of Domestic Violence Allegations


The consequences of domestic violence allegations are devastating and range from the stigma that is attached to the accused regardless of the outcome, the criminal record of arrest, loss of employment, no access to children, loss of their home and in some instances the loss of liberty.


Domestic Abuse Protection Notices (DAPN's)


A DAPN can be issued as an emergency measure by the police which immediately prevents the accused from going near the complainant, their home and people who may be closely connected to them. This is a short term measure and the police should apply for a Domestic Abuse Protection Order as soon as possible to make the restrictions on the accused more formal and legally robust.


Domestic Abuse Protection Order (DAPO's)


Usually within 48 hours of the police issuing an DAPN the court will hear an application made by the police for a DAPN.


A DAPO can be made by the court to protect complainants from all forms of domestic abuse, including non-physical abuse and controlling or coercive behaviour. A DAPO may be made by a court during ongoing criminal, family, or civil proceedings.


Applications can also be made by the police, by the complainant themselves or by someone who is not directly involved, known as a ‘third party’. A third party could include a family member, a friend, or a social worker.


DAPOs are protective orders and can be used to impose restrictions and conditions on the person accused

.

  • A prohibition is a rule that prevents someone from doing something. For example, this could include stopping the accused from coming within a specified distance of a complainant’s home and/or any specified premises, such as a workplace.


  • A DAPO will always include mandatory notification requirements. This means that the accused subject to a DAPO must tell the police their name and address and tell the police of any changes to these. The accused subject to a DAPO is required to first tell the police their name and address within 3 days of a DAPO being made, and after that, within 3 days of any changes to these.


  • The court may decide to impose electronic monitoring (known as ‘tagging’) on the accused to monitor whether they are following certain rules of the DAPO, for example those that stop them from coming within a specified distance of the complainant's home.


  • The court may also decide to impose a positive requirement that calls for the accused to take positive action, such as attending a behaviour change programme.


There is no requirement for a conviction for the police and court to issue a DAPN or DAPO and therefore, it can seem a harsh and unfair course of action to take where a person is innocent.


Family Court Proceedings


It is not unusual for their to be domestic allegations made where family proceeding are underway, it can sometimes be clear that allegations are made to the police to bolster application to the family court. Domestic abuse allegations made to the police can assist with funding applications for family court proceedings, strengthen applications for Non Molestation Orders, Residency Orders, and Child Arrangement Order. Our team help our clients to establish and prove the motive of the complainant when such circumstances are present.


We work alongside some fantastic legal firms who offer family law advice and representation. We can put you in touch with likeminded legal professionals who will aim to ensure your family rights and entitlements are protected. Family and criminal lawyers working closely together is essential, to ensure a streamlined and consistent approach is taken to all proceedings.


Criminal Investigation and Court Proceedings


The police investigation of domestic abuse allegations can be lengthy, each case will prompt the police to carry out various lines of enquiry and they vary depending on the circumstances. They can include forensic examinations both electronic and medical, obtaining third party records and statements, obtaining witness statements and any recordings or footage.


We always advise our clients that they are also entitled to raise lines of enquiry for their defence. We often invite the police to consider particular avenues for our client or we undertake the investigative work ourselves. Pro active pre-charge work to build the defence of the accused is often a very sensible and successful route to take in such cases.


If the accused is charge with an offence then court proceedings would commence. Many people are charged with offences who are not convicted, therefore this should never deter a person from robustly working to defend their position. Although you may feel defeated at the very thought of being charged, our team do not give up the fight for our clients. We have access to some of the country's leading barristers and forensic experts, bringing out clients a strong defence team.


What Can You Do Next and How Can We Help


If you are reading this blog, you are probably concerned about the behaviour of your spouse or partner, or you have been falsely accused of domestic abuse. It is important that you obtain legal advice, our team specialise in both domestic and sexual abuse this is because often they come hand in hand. We can help you to navigate what often is a lonely path to ensure that you obtain the right outcome at the end, putting together a pro active plan to ensure you are not subjected to the consequences of domestic abuse allegations.


Contact Us

We Can Help With

By Jess Wilson June 13, 2025
Have you been charged with indecent image possession? Do you want to know how many cases get dropped? Read our latest article to learn more.
By Jess Wilson June 11, 2025
Understanding the difference between “consent” and “reasonable belief” can be key if you are being investigated or prosecuted for a sexual offence, where these two issues can arise. These are not just technical legal terms; they are real-world concepts that can affect the outcome of serious sexual abuse cases. At Eventum Legal, our aim is to help people grasp these important ideas so that they know where they stand, whether they’re seeking justice, facing an accusation, or just wanting to be informed. Consent and the Law: What Does It Mean? When it comes to sexual activity, the law makes it very clear that “consent” isn’t just about saying yes or no. Consent means agreeing by choice, having the freedom and capacity to make that choice, and being able to change your mind at any time, even if the sexual activity has begun. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states that a person consents if they agree by choice and have the freedom and capacity to do so. In practical terms, this means no one should be pressured, forced, or tricked into sex. If someone is too drunk, too scared, or otherwise unable to decide, they cannot legally give consent. This applies also to issues with mental capacity where someone may not have the understanding or ability to give informed consent. When establishing whether consent or reasonable belief applies, the courts examine everything that happened, how the people involved acted, what was said, their relationship, and whether any threats were made. It’s not about just hearing a yes or no, but about whether the agreement was truly given, freely and knowingly, at the time. Reasonable Belief: The Other Side of the Coin While “consent” focuses on the person on the receiving end of sexual activity, “reasonable belief” is about the perspective of the person accused of the crime. UK law says it’s not enough for someone to claim they thought the other person was consenting. The belief that consent existed must be reasonable; it must meet the standard of what a reasonable person would think in those circumstances. This comes down to two questions: did the accused genuinely believe the other person was consenting, and would a reasonable person, knowing what the accused knew and considering everything that happened, have reached the same conclusion? It’s not a defence to say, “I just thought it was okay,” if evidence, actions, or common sense didn’t back that belief up. Courts look at whether the accused checked for consent, paid attention to what was happening, and took steps to make sure everything was agreed upon. How the Law Applies These Concepts The distinction between consent and reasonable belief matters because everyone is responsible for ensuring that consent is present, not just assuming or hoping it is. The prosecution in a sexual offence case has to prove that there was no consent or that the accused did not have a reasonable belief that consent existed. To judge this, courts examine the context: Were both people sober and able to make decisions? Was there clear, positive agreement? Did one person ignore signs of hesitation or discomfort? In cases where someone is very intoxicated or unable to communicate, the law presumes that there is no consent, and it is challenging for anyone to claim a reasonable belief otherwise. However, where alcohol is in question the issue can become complex as we all have difference alcohol tolerances, what may be too drunk to one person, could be different to the other. Therefore, working to establish the intoxication and affect is crucial for lawyers in some cases. In cases where it can be proven that that someone was too drunk to speak or move, and the accused says they thought there was consent just because the person didn’t say “no,” the court is unlikely to accept that as reasonable. The law expects people to check in with their partner, look for positive signs, and stop if there’s any doubt. Clearing Up Common Myths Many misunderstandings exist about how consent and reasonable belief work in real life. One myth is that if someone doesn’t say “no,” they must have agreed. The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” Another myth is that if two people are in a relationship or have had sex before, consent is always assumed. Every sexual act requires consent, every time. Some people also believe that as long as they honestly thought there was consent, that’s enough. But the law sets a higher bar: the belief has to be reasonable, meaning it must be backed up by what happened and what a reasonable person would think. In our digital age, misunderstandings can easily happen through text or online communication. Courts are aware of this and look at all available evidence, including messages and social media, to determine what happened. Other avenues of evidence exploration can include CCTV footage and witnesses. Why These Legal Standards Matter The way UK law approaches consent and reasonable belief has changed over time. In the past, people could argue they had an “honest” belief in consent, even if it wasn’t reasonable. That changed with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which now requires honesty and reasonableness. This protects people from harm and ensures that the law takes the experiences and choices of everyone involved seriously. These rules are designed to keep people safe and ensure everyone’s rights are respected. The law encourages open communication, respect, and responsibility. It expects everyone to look for clear signs of agreement and to stop if there is any doubt or hesitation. What To Do If You’re Involved In A Sexual Offence Case Suppose you’re facing a situation involving consent or reasonable belief and you as the accused want to prove that either of these legal requirements existed, then you must seek legal advice and engage with specialist lawyers who can navigate the complexities of the key legal issues in sexual offence cases. These cases can be stressful and complex, and every detail matters: what was said, what was done, and what steps were taken to ensure everyone agreed. At Eventum Legal, we specialise in helping people understand their rights and responsibilities. We listen, explain your options in straightforward language, and support you throughout the process, always with respect and confidentiality.  Whether you’re seeking justice, defending your reputation, or simply want to know your rights, we’re here to help. Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between consent and reasonable belief? Consent is when a person freely agrees to a sexual act. Reasonable belief is whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed that consent was given, based on all the facts. Can someone be convicted if they misunderstood consent? Yes, if their belief in consent wasn’t reasonable. The court looks at the whole situation, not just what the accused thought. How can I protect myself or prove consent? Open communication and ensuring everyone is comfortable and willing are the safest approaches. If you’re worried about misunderstandings, keep records of conversations. Where can I get help or advice? Contact Eventum Legal for confidential, expert support tailored to your needs.
By Sylvie Smith June 5, 2025
Have you been accused of breaching your SHPO, maybe by accident or knowingly? Speak to our specialist team.
More Posts